Learning Gateway User Group
HyperV – The Design Phase

After last years complete rebuild of the network cabling infrastructure and data switches, the major project for this year is to rebuild our domain from scratch. We have decided to do this using a HyperV environment. The reasons for doing this are numerous but the main two being cost savings from going from 24 physical servers down to 9 virtual servers under the current draft design and the future ease of management and ability to add new servers without the cost of purchasing new hardware.

So the point of this post is to show you our 1st draft of the server infrastructure we came up with and if you feel the need to comment then please do so.

 

Current Infrastructure

We currently have the following physical servers

Server Role
DC1 DC / GC / DHCP / DNS
DC2 DC / GC / DNS / CA
DEPLOYMENTSVR WDS
SRV-TMG FIREWALL / PUBLISHING PROXY
SMOOTHIE SMOOTHWALL PROXY
SRV-ALLAN ALLAN TESTS SERVER
BACKUP01 VERITAS BACKUP SERVER
CUTTERNAS TS LOAD BALANCING SERVER
WHSRV07 EXCHANGE
WHSRV08 CMIS
WHSRV04 FILE SERVER
WHSRV06 SHAREPOINT
SRV-ANTIVIRUS MCAFEE SERVER
SIMSSERV SIMS HR
SRV-SPWEB SHAREPOINT FOR WEB
SRV-MEDIA STREAMING MEDIA
BESRV BLACKBERRY SERVER
TSERVER1 TERMINAL SERVER
TSERVER2 TERMINAL SERVER
TSERVER3 TERMINAL SERVER
TSERVER4 TERMINAL SERVER
VSERVER01 HYPER V SERVER
SOLARIS1 SUN RAY THIN CLIENT SERVER
SOLARIS2 SUN RAY THIN CLIENT SERVER

The HyperV server currently runs 5 servers

 

1st Draft

Here is an image of our 1st draft of the new infrastructure

image

The thinking behind this is quite simple.

  • Anything connected to the outside world should be separate from your internal network so the two proxies, one for outgoing traffic and one for incoming traffic are kept as physical servers
  • Our Sun Ray thin client system uses Sun Solaris servers to deal with the clients and point them in the direction of the Windows TS load balancer. They are very specialised and not ideal for HyperV
  • Personally I think you should have at least 1 DC as a physical server, you can then have redundant ones in the HyperV environment
  • Our Veritas backup server uses a direct attached tape carousel which HyperV does not recognise

We will then purchase 3 new servers for the HyperV cluster backed up by a SAN for the storage of the HyperV data and VHD’s

So that's the start of the process, if you have any comments then please put them down and maybe we can start a discussion around HyperV


Posted 01-20-2010 2:07 AM by Alan Richards
Powered by Community Server (Commercial Edition), by Telligent Systems